< | up | >
Reactive follicular hyperplasia and early progressive transformation of germinal centers (4574)
Reactive follicular hyperplasia and early progressive transformation of germinal centersclosed
Subtitle: Cervical lymphadenopathy in a-42-year-old female
Type:
lymph node
Sender:
semir
2008-01-05 16:47
INCTR - EBMWG Hematopathology Online
We present here of the cervical lymphadenopathy in a-42-year old female. Two suspected lymph nodes were surgically removed of which larger one measured 3.2x1.8 cm while another measured 1x0.4 cm.  
Microscopically, a preserved germ centers with enlarged marginal zones of the follicles were a dominant feature. Lymphocytes in marginal zones were of monocytoid appearance with their progagation into interfollicular areas which contained proliferating blood vessels with some plasma cells and eosinophils.  
Immunohistochemistry: CD20(+), Bcl-2(positive in interfollicular and marginal zone), CD3(sporadically positive in interfollicular areas), IgD(+), IgG(-/+), CD43(-), CD5(-).  
Clinical diagnosis: No  
Histopathological diagnosis: Marginal zone lymphoma?  
Please, give your opinion.
Annotations » Add comment (Login)
Mueller-Hermelink
2008-01-06 17:36
The most probable diagnosis would be reactive lymphadenopathy with follicular hyperplasia and early progressive germinal center transformation. However, in these instances I have seen several times a so-called Mantle cell lymphoma in situ , which should be excluded by CD5 and CND1 staining.
anpo
2008-01-06 19:50
I agree, by morphology it looks reactive, but cyclin D1 should be done to be on the safe side.
nurija
2008-01-06 22:50
The stain for CD5 highlights only the few paracortical T cells present, and the stain for CD10 highlights only the germinal center cells. Also, an immunostain for bcl-2 is positive on the monomorphous population of lymphocytes and is negative in the germinal centers.  
Tomorrow we will add to the few new images.
semir
2008-01-09 23:11
More figures added in order to clarify this lesion.
hurwitz
2008-01-10 16:58
I agree, morphology and immunohistochemistry strongly favour reactive follicular and interfollicular hyperplasia. The question is, if PCR for IgH rearrangenet should be performed to be on the safe side.
Mueller-Hermelink
2008-01-11 20:51
The CD5 stain is very convincing : I would sign out as freactive hyperplasia.
hurwitz
2008-01-16 19:06
Thank you Dr.Müller Hermelink, your statement is the final one.  
Thanks also to Semir, Nurja and Anja.
» Add comment (Login)
Last modified: 2008-01-05 16:47:58